Risk Toolkit › Liquidity & Funding
Risk Toolkit · Liquidity
Liquidity & Funding
A hedge that is right on paper can still sink a firm if the margin calls can’t be funded. This is the difference between market and funding liquidity — and why it matters.
01Overview
A hedge that is right on paper can still fail if it cannot be funded through margin calls. This hub distinguishes market liquidity from funding liquidity and covers how firms manage the cash demands that derivatives positions create.
How it works
There are two distinct liquidities. Market liquidity is the ability to trade an asset quickly without moving its price. Funding liquidity is the ability to meet cash obligations as they fall due — most sharply, the margin calls a derivatives position generates. The two interact dangerously: a hedge can be economically correct yet still sink a firm if rising variation margin cannot be funded, forcing the position to be closed at the worst possible time. Managing liquidity therefore means holding cash and high-quality liquid assets against plausible calls, not just marking the hedge to market.
The funding spiral — how a correct hedge can still force a sale
In practice
After 2008, Basel III introduced two standards: the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) — enough high-quality liquid assets to survive a 30-day stress — and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) for longer-term funding stability. The textbook case for commodity firms is the 2022 European energy crisis: the TTF gas benchmark spiked to roughly ten times its prior-decade level, cleared initial-margin calls ran more than 20× the pre-stress average, and intraday variation-margin calls of hundreds of millions strained even solvent, well-hedged firms — prompting regulatory work on margin transparency and liquidity preparedness.
02Key methods
Trading without moving price, versus meeting cash obligations as they fall due — two distinct risks that interact.
Forecasting and funding variation-margin calls on derivatives, especially under stress.
Holding high-quality liquid assets against plausible calls rather than just marking the hedge to market.
Basel III ratios for surviving a 30-day stress and for longer-term funding stability.
After 2008, Basel III introduced the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). The textbook stress: in the 2022 European energy crisis, TTF gas spiked ~10× and cleared initial-margin calls ran >20× the pre-stress average, straining even solvent, well-hedged firms.
Sources & credits
Standard-setting and primary sources. Links open the original publication.
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) — Executive Summary Standard-setter: The Basel III liquidity standard · bis.org
- Margins and liquidity in European energy markets in 2022 Primary: BIS analysis of the 2022 margin spike · bis.org
- Margin dynamics in centrally cleared commodities markets in 2022 Authoritative: Joint standard-setter review · bis.org
Stress a funding position
Use the Tools page to see how a price shock translates into margin calls and funding need.
